<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hospitals need to go Green!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.preceptgroup.com/blog/wp-404-handler.php/blog/2008/hospitals-need-to-go-green/feed/?404;http://www.preceptgroup.com:80/blog/2008/hospitals-need-to-go-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.preceptgroup.com/blog/2008/hospitals-need-to-go-green/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=hospitals-need-to-go-green</link>
	<description>An insider&#039;s perspective on employee benefit programs and the issues that affect employers most.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:03:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mari McCully</title>
		<link>http://www.preceptgroup.com/blog/2008/hospitals-need-to-go-green/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari McCully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdev.preceptgroup.com/blog/?p=2638#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hospitals are required by law to provide you with an itemized statement which reflects their usual and customary charges (called a Charge Master) for each service and supply billed.  The &quot;re-pricers&quot; make recommendations to your insurance company as to what it should reimburse after &quot;bundles charges,&quot; denies some charges in their entirely, and &quot;re-prices&quot; charges that it decides to reimburse based on the re-pricer&#039;s determination of &quot;usual and customary and reasonable.&quot;  What the re-pricers don&#039;t want you to know, is that the &quot;data&quot; that they use is unaudited, flawed, and unfairly biased in the insurer (and the re-pricer&#039;s) favor, because the re-pricer is typically reimbursed a percentage of the amount it discounted from the hospital&#039;s bill.  Even if the insurance company ultimately reimburses the hospital (this happens with individual heatlh care providers, as well) an amount that is in accordance with your insurance policy, or its &quot;network&quot; agreement, if any, with the hospital, by using these &quot;re-pricer&quot; strategies they are unfairly delaying payment, and gaining an unfair benefit through the time value of money.  There is a substantial amount of litigation currently pending regarding this issue, including the Attorney General of New York against a company called Ingenix and its corporate parent.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hospitals are required by law to provide you with an itemized statement which reflects their usual and customary charges (called a Charge Master) for each service and supply billed.  The &#8220;re-pricers&#8221; make recommendations to your insurance company as to what it should reimburse after &#8220;bundles charges,&#8221; denies some charges in their entirely, and &#8220;re-prices&#8221; charges that it decides to reimburse based on the re-pricer&#8217;s determination of &#8220;usual and customary and reasonable.&#8221;  What the re-pricers don&#8217;t want you to know, is that the &#8220;data&#8221; that they use is unaudited, flawed, and unfairly biased in the insurer (and the re-pricer&#8217;s) favor, because the re-pricer is typically reimbursed a percentage of the amount it discounted from the hospital&#8217;s bill.  Even if the insurance company ultimately reimburses the hospital (this happens with individual heatlh care providers, as well) an amount that is in accordance with your insurance policy, or its &#8220;network&#8221; agreement, if any, with the hospital, by using these &#8220;re-pricer&#8221; strategies they are unfairly delaying payment, and gaining an unfair benefit through the time value of money.  There is a substantial amount of litigation currently pending regarding this issue, including the Attorney General of New York against a company called Ingenix and its corporate parent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
